🔗 Share this article

The move from the Democratic National Committee to withhold the release regarding its internal autopsy report on the last presidential race is stunning but entirely predictable. Opposed to unpleasant candor, the Democrats' governing body behaves closer to a communications shop rather than a political organization focused on building a volunteer base to secure victories.

A Climate Resistant to Internal Critique

Hesitant to depart from the prevailing attitude demanding unity, the DNC has stayed within the Biden-Harris shadow throughout this past year. Making public such a report could have demonstrated that the leadership are interested to foster open debate about the missteps that paved the way for Donald Trump to return to the White House. Instead, the committee is acting as if there is little to glean from the electoral catastrophe from the last cycle.

Our guiding principle: will this lead to victory? If the answer is no, it’s a distraction from the core mission," a justification reportedly given for withholding the report.

Key Issues a Report Could Have Explored

An autopsy report of substance would confront a series of difficult topics. Among them are:

• Electoral Disengagement: Failing to retain of millions of voters who supported the Democratic ticket in 2020 proved pivotal during the tight 2024 election.
• A Decision to Run: The unwavering decision of the incumbent to stay in the race, alongside a last-minute step-aside, is seen by some as denying Democratic voters the chance for open primaries.
• Abandoning Core Democratic Voters: Amid inflation, the electoral effort allegedly ceding to powerful financial backers without successfully attempting to confront the role of big business.
• A Gaza Impact: The failure to adjust a stance concerning a ongoing war allegedly caused alienating many voters, particularly with youth voters, Arab American communities, Muslim voters.
• Losing Young Voter Support: Polling data shows a significant decrease in votes for the candidate from young voters.

A History of Evasion

The decision to withhold aligns with a pattern of sidestepping difficult realities. This mirrors a situation in which nearly all Democratic officeholder in Congress went along with a sitting president's determination to seeking another term right up until a poor televised debate compelled an exit.

Concurrently, a significant majority within the party's base had been consistently telling pollsters of their opposition to the incumbent to be the nominee.

Financial Concerns

An honest autopsy could examine questions about where money went, including what sums went to insider consultants as well as advertising contractors over the course of a campaign which expended a staggering amount during the general election.

A Broader Issue

Ultimately, the suppression of the official autopsy points to a deference toward party leaders responsible for a disastrous national race. The message to the party's base – which includes millions of dedicated activists – is that they cannot have a right to understand what the leadership say they discovered based on an analysis based on feedback from all states.

A political entity unwilling to honestly assess its mistakes will struggle to escape the cycle that proved so advantageous to the rival party.